Interesting question! So you're exploring screen-sharing in classroom settings — specifically understanding when people feel the need to moderate or control who gets to share their screen.

Let me play back the key dimensions I see here:

Problem space:

• Context triggers — What situations make moderation feel necessary (chaos, inappropriate content, time management, etc.)
• Control preferences — Who should have moderation power (teacher only, student helpers, automatic rules)
• Trust vs. efficiency trade-offs — Balancing open participation with structured control
• Pain points — What goes wrong when there's no moderation vs. too much

I have a few directions we could take for the research question:

Great choice! Understanding who should control screen sharing is a really practical angle — it directly informs how you'd design permission systems.

Now let me check what tools I have available to build this exercise:

I've got access to drag-and-drop, animations, and icons. Here are some creative exercise ideas for exploring who should control screen sharing:

Nice! I'll build a Classroom Scenario Sorter — interviewees will see different classroom situations (like "student wants to show their project" or "random student shares during lecture") and drag them to who they think should approve or control that sharing.

Let me build this:

Here's your exercise: Classroom Scenario Sorter

How it works:

• Interviewees see 5 common classroom screen-sharing situations (showing a project, asking a visual question, sharing during lecture, group collab, tech help)
• They drag each scenario to one of three control options: Teacher Only, Any Student, or Automatic Rules
• Clicking an assigned scenario sends it back to the pool
• Smooth animations make it feel responsive

What you'll learn:

• Which situations people feel need teacher approval vs. student autonomy
• Whether people trust automated systems for certain contexts
• Commentary will reveal why they made each choice — the reasoning behind their control preferences

The exercise provokes reflection by making them sort specific situations rather than answer abstractly — you'll get much richer insights from their spoken rationale as they decide where each scenario belongs.

Want me to tweak anything — different scenarios, add another control option, or adjust the design?

Here's the prettier version: Classroom Scenario Sorter

What I improved:

• Gradient badge header with a nice pill design
• Staggered entrance animations for scenarios appearing one by one
• Richer color palettes — each drop zone has its own gradient accent (purple/violet, emerald/teal, amber/orange)
• Playful micro-interactions: icon wiggle when hovering over drop zones, subtle rotations on drag
• Softer rounded corners (rounded-2xl) and better spacing
• Count badges that pop in when items are assigned
• "Release to drop here" hint when dragging over a zone
• Celebratory "All sorted!" message with pulsing checkmark

Want me to adjust colors, add more polish, or change anything else?

Good idea! A 2x2 quadrant is great for mapping scenarios across two dimensions. Let me think of axes that would reveal richer insights about screen-sharing control...

Here's the 2x2 quadrant version: Screen Sharing Quadrant Sorter

The two axes:

• Horizontal: Teacher-led ↔ Student-led (who initiates)
• Vertical: Exception ↔ Routine (how often it happens)

Four quadrants:

• 🟣 Teacher-led + Exception — rare teacher-driven moments
• 🟢 Student-led + Exception — unusual student requests
• 🟠 Teacher-led + Routine — standard teacher activities
• 🔵 Student-led + Routine — everyday student sharing

How it works:

• Drag scenarios anywhere on the grid — position matters, not just quadrant
• Tokens change color based on which quadrant they land in
• Click to remove and re-place
• Precise X/Y coordinates are captured for analysis

This reveals how people mentally categorize different sharing situations, which tells you where they'd want tight control (exceptions) vs. loose rules (routine), and who they see as the natural driver of each activity.

Want me to tweak the axes, scenarios, or styling?